Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SNEMX
RNWBX vs SNEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SNEMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
AB Emerging Markets
Price$34.60
Change+$0.32 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
RNWBX vs SNEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SNEMX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SNEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. SNEMX (1.25B). SNEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SNEMX (1.63) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SNEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SNEMX (30 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SNEMX (1.30). SNEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SNEMX: RNWBX (250) vs SNEMX (5000). SNEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.32 vs. RNWBX (19.18). SNEMX return over 5 years is better than : 16.87 vs. RNWBX (7.90).
| RNWBX | SNEMX | RNWBX / SNEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.30 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.30 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.884 | 28.148 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 1.25B | 6,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.63 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.18 | 26.32 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.02 | 51.92 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | 16.87 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.81 | 71.35 | 116% |