Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFVLX
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.32
Change+$0.15 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$17.64
Change+$0.09 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.21M
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFVLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SFVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. SFVLX (133M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFVLX (2.88) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SFVLX (10 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFVLX (1.19). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWBX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.61 vs. RNWBX (18.78). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 65.28 vs. RNWBX (14.40).
| RNWBX | SFVLX | RNWBX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.19 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.772 | 35.012 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 133M | 56,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 2.88 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.78 | 30.61 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 48.90 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | 65.28 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers