Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFGIX
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFGIX
American Funds New World R2
Price$93.60
Change-$0.45 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Seafarer Overseas Gr and Income Investor
Price$16.35
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.46B
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFGIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SFGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. SFGIX (3.46B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFGIX (2.81) vs RNWBX (0.45). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SFGIX (14 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than SFGIX (0.97). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFGIX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWBX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.55 vs. RNWBX (26.27). SFGIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.95 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| RNWBX | SFGIX | RNWBX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.97 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.97 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.996 | 10.976 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 3.46B | 2,180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 2.81 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.27 | 44.55 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 47.82 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | 20.95 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | 102.78 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers