Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFGIX
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFGIX
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
Seafarer Overseas Gr and Income Investor
Price$14.61
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.17B
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFGIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SFGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. SFGIX (3.17B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFGIX (2.27) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SFGIX (14 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFGIX (0.97). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFGIX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWBX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.46 vs. RNWBX (20.32). SFGIX (21.57) and RNWBX (21.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWBX | SFGIX | RNWBX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.97 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.97 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.152 | 28.516 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6B | 3.17B | 2,414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 2.27 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.32 | 24.46 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.10 | 34.30 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.37 | 21.57 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.86 | 64.36 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers