Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SEKCX
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SEKCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
DWS Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$19.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.47M
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SEKCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SEKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. SEKCX (64.5M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than SEKCX: RNWBX (0.12) vs SEKCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SEKCX (24 years). SEKCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKCX: RNWBX (250) vs SEKCX (1000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.35 vs. RNWBX (14.20). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. SEKCX (6.20).
| RNWBX | SEKCX | RNWBX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.92 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.34 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.440 | 22.257 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.7B | 64.5M | 115,814% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 17.35 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.19 | 47.14 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.32 | 6.20 | 392% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.87 | 54.59 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement