Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SEKCX
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SEKCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
DWS Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$21.94
Change+$2.04 (+10.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.29M
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SEKCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SEKCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. SEKCX (70.3M). SEKCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SEKCX (1.51) vs RNWBX (0.45). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SEKCX (25 years). SEKCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKCX: RNWBX (250) vs SEKCX (1000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.57 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. SEKCX (-2.18).
| RNWBX | SEKCX | RNWBX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.92 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.34 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.996 | 8.937 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 70.3M | 107,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.51 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.27 | 38.57 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 42.57 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | -2.18 | -323% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | 109.84 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement