Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SEKCX
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SEKCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
DWS Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$20.04
Change+$0.07 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.05M
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SEKCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SEKCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. SEKCX (65M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than SEKCX: RNWBX (0.12) vs SEKCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SEKCX (25 years). SEKCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKCX: RNWBX (250) vs SEKCX (1000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.79 vs. RNWBX (19.18). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. SEKCX (-1.84).
| RNWBX | SEKCX | RNWBX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.92 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.34 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.884 | 24.938 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 65M | 115,846% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.18 | 22.79 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.02 | 39.03 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | -1.84 | -430% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.81 | 68.92 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement