Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SBHEX
RNWBX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SBHEX
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl
Price$12.90
Change+$1.33 (+11.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.95M
RNWBX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SBHEX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. SBHEX (94.9M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SBHEX (2.44) vs RNWBX (0.45). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SBHEX (12 years). SBHEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWBX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.50 vs. RNWBX (26.27). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.44 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| RNWBX | SBHEX | RNWBX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.14 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.21 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.996 | 9.694 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 94.9M | 79,557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 2.44 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.27 | 46.50 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 89.19 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | 63.44 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | 194.85 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement