Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SBHEX
RNWBX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SBHEX
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl
Price$12.06
Change+$0.09 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.26M
RNWBX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SBHEX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SBHEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. SBHEX (88.3M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SBHEX (5.04) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SBHEX (12 years). SBHEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWBX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.94 vs. RNWBX (19.18). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.65 vs. RNWBX (7.90).
| RNWBX | SBHEX | RNWBX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.14 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.884 | 34.749 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 88.3M | 85,277% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 5.04 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.18 | 32.94 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.02 | 84.48 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | 64.65 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.81 | 146.30 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement