Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNTTX vs VFWPX
RNTTX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RNTTX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts M
Price$51.64
Change-$0.45 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.44
Change-$1.59 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RNTTX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNTTX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNTTX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RNTTX (1.12B). RNTTX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: RNTTX (2.88) vs VFWPX (2.70). RNTTX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RNTTX (9 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RNTTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RNTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RNTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RNTTX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.36 vs. RNTTX (23.94). RNTTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.45 vs. VFWPX (39.87).
| RNTTX | VFWPX | RNTTX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.03 | 3,433% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.709 | 29.164 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.70 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.94 | 25.36 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.72 | 50.03 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.45 | 39.87 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement