Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNTTX vs VFWPX
RNTTX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RNTTX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts M
Price$51.13
Change+$0.21 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.39
Change+$13.31 (+8.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
RNTTX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNTTX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNTTX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. RNTTX (1.29B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RNTTX: VFWPX (2.93) vs RNTTX (0.97). RNTTX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RNTTX (9 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RNTTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RNTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). RNTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RNTTX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.29 vs. RNTTX (21.75). RNTTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.59 vs. VFWPX (34.77).
| RNTTX | VFWPX | RNTTX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.03 | 3,433% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.796 | 6.471 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 78.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 2.93 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.75 | 34.29 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.77 | 47.98 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.59 | 34.77 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement