Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPFX vs SGACX
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts RNPFX vs SGACX
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.14
Change-$1.23 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Virtus SGA Global Growth C
Price$20.13
Change-$0.32 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.19M
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPFX vs. SGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPFX is a Buy and SGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. SGACX (216M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than SGACX: RNPFX (0.69) vs SGACX (0.00). RNPFX was incepted earlier than SGACX: RNPFX (24 years) vs SGACX (12 years). SGACX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: RNPFX (250) vs SGACX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. SGACX (-23.98). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.27 vs. SGACX (-23.69).
| RNPFX | SGACX | RNPFX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.00 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.17 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.486 | 2.558 | 840% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 216M | 76,389% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.98 | -23.98 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.80 | 1.54 | 3,365% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.27 | -23.69 | -149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.58 | 43.88 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers