Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$67.54
Change-$1.13 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
William Blair Global Leaders I
Price$12.22
Change-$0.18 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.66M
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Buy and WGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. WGFIX (25.7M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (0.21) vs RNPAX (0.00). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (23 years) vs WGFIX (18 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than WGFIX (1.22). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.37 vs. WGFIX (-27.45). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.13 vs. WGFIX (-33.09).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.22 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.410 | 15.242 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 25.7M | 642,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.37 | -27.45 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.27 | -11.70 | -404% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.13 | -33.09 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.25 | 6.38 | 1,416% |