Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$65.68
Change+$0.31 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
William Blair Global Leaders I
Price$11.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.78M
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Buy and WGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. WGFIX (42.8M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (0.22) vs RNPAX (0.00). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (23 years) vs WGFIX (18 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than WGFIX (1.22). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. WGFIX (-26.66). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.37 vs. WGFIX (-31.43).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.22 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.167 | 10.037 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 42.8M | 371,495% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.89 | -26.66 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.16 | -12.91 | -350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.37 | -31.43 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.34 | 5.08 | 1,719% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement