Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$65.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
William Blair Global Leaders I
Price$11.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.45M
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Buy and WGFIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. WGFIX (43.4M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (0.22) vs RNPAX (0.00). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (23 years) vs WGFIX (18 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than WGFIX (1.22). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. WGFIX (-26.12). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.49 vs. WGFIX (-26.57).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.22 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.150 | 10.223 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 43.4M | 364,055% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.73 | -26.12 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.57 | -14.76 | -282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.49 | -26.57 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.28 | -1.78 | -4,279% |