Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$67.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
William Blair Global Leaders I
Price$12.05
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.53M
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Hold and WGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. WGFIX (38.5M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (0.21) vs RNPAX (0.00). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (23 years) vs WGFIX (18 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than WGFIX (1.22). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. WGFIX (-29.12). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. WGFIX (-33.48).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.22 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.359 | 11.989 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 38.5M | 423,377% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | -29.12 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.67 | -5.69 | -1,013% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.26 | -33.48 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.53 | 2.35 | 3,728% |