RNG
Price
$26.94
Change
-$1.91 (-6.62%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.47B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZM
Price
$81.50
Change
-$1.26 (-1.52%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.51B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RNG vs ZM

Header iconRNG vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts RNG vs ZMBanner chart's image
RINGCENTRAL
Price$26.94
Change-$1.91 (-6.62%)
Volume$12.25K
Capitalization2.47B
Zoom Communications
Price$81.50
Change-$1.26 (-1.52%)
Volume$32.79K
Capitalization24.51B
RNG vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RNG vs. ZM commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNG is a Hold and ZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (RNG: $28.85 vs. ZM: $82.76)
Brand notoriety: RNG: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RNG: 98% vs. ZM: 77%
Market capitalization -- RNG: $2.47B vs. ZM: $24.51B
RNG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.47B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $24.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $289.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RNG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RNG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RNG and ZM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RNG is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

RNG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

RNG is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($24.5B) has a higher market cap than RNG($2.47B). RNG has higher P/E ratio than ZM: RNG (206.07) vs ZM (16.10). RNG YTD gains are higher at: -0.104 vs. ZM (-4.091). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.23B vs. RNG (314M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. RNG (145M). ZM has less debt than RNG: ZM (48.5M) vs RNG (1.3B). ZM has higher revenues than RNG: ZM (4.81B) vs RNG (2.49B).
RNGZMRNG / ZM
Capitalization2.47B24.5B10%
EBITDA314M1.23B25%
Gain YTD-0.104-4.0913%
P/E Ratio206.0716.101,280%
Revenue2.49B4.81B52%
Total Cash145M7.94B2%
Total Debt1.3B48.5M2,670%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNG vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
RNG
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7859
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4790
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZM's Valuation (78) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RNG (94). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to RNG’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RNG (100). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to RNG’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's SMR Rating (50) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNG (100). This means that ZM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNG’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RNG (60). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to RNG’s over the last 12 months.

RNG's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (90). This means that RNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RNGZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NDVBX16.160.12
+0.75%
MFS New Discovery Value B
PIERX31.110.11
+0.35%
Putnam International Equity R
APHLX14.750.03
+0.20%
Artisan Value Institutional
FBCGX45.09N/A
N/A
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6
RMORX27.18-0.10
-0.37%
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth R6

RNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNG has been loosely correlated with KVYO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNG jumps, then KVYO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNG
1D Price
Change %
RNG100%
+1.30%
KVYO - RNG
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
COIN - RNG
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
SHOP - RNG
62%
Loosely correlated
-5.93%
ZS - RNG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
CLSK - RNG
59%
Loosely correlated
+6.29%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
-0.52%
COIN - ZM
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
CLSK - ZM
62%
Loosely correlated
+6.29%
FRSH - ZM
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
CRM - ZM
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
RNG - ZM
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More