RNECF
Price
$12.50
Change
+$0.12 (+0.97%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
21.83B
ROHCF
Price
$15.00
Change
+$0.75 (+5.26%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
5.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RNECF vs ROHCF

Header iconRNECF vs ROHCF Comparison
Open Charts RNECF vs ROHCFBanner chart's image
Renesas Electronics
Price$12.50
Change+$0.12 (+0.97%)
Volume$100
Capitalization21.83B
Rohm
Price$15.00
Change+$0.75 (+5.26%)
Volume$400
Capitalization5.8B
RNECF vs ROHCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RNECF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RNECF vs. ROHCF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNECF is a Buy and ROHCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RNECF: $12.50 vs. ROHCF: $15.00)
Brand notoriety: RNECF and ROHCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RNECF: 3% vs. ROHCF: 21%
Market capitalization -- RNECF: $21.83B vs. ROHCF: $5.8B
RNECF [@Semiconductors] is valued at $21.83B. ROHCF’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $5.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $96.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RNECF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileROHCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RNECF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ROHCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ROHCF is a better buy in the long-term than RNECF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RNECF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROHCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RNECF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ROHCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RNECF is a better buy in the short-term than ROHCF.

Price Growth

RNECF (@Semiconductors) experienced а +6.34% price change this week, while ROHCF (@Semiconductors) price change was +5.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.33% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNECF($21.8B) has a higher market cap than ROHCF($5.8B). ROHCF has higher P/E ratio than RNECF: ROHCF (59.36) vs RNECF (20.68). ROHCF YTD gains are higher at: 63.043 vs. RNECF (-4.215). RNECF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 380B vs. ROHCF (14.7B). RNECF (213B) and ROHCF (213B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ROHCF has less debt than RNECF: ROHCF (400B) vs RNECF (1.33T). RNECF has higher revenues than ROHCF: RNECF (1.27T) vs ROHCF (446B).
RNECFROHCFRNECF / ROHCF
Capitalization21.8B5.8B376%
EBITDA380B14.7B2,585%
Gain YTD-4.21563.043-7%
P/E Ratio20.6859.3635%
Revenue1.27T446B285%
Total Cash213B213B100%
Total Debt1.33T400B332%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNECF vs ROHCF: Fundamental Ratings
RNECF
ROHCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2298
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6599
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
304
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ROHCF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as RNECF (18). This means that ROHCF’s stock grew similarly to RNECF’s over the last 12 months.

RNECF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROHCF (99). This means that RNECF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROHCF’s over the last 12 months.

ROHCF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as RNECF (100). This means that ROHCF’s stock grew similarly to RNECF’s over the last 12 months.

ROHCF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as RNECF (60). This means that ROHCF’s stock grew similarly to RNECF’s over the last 12 months.

ROHCF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as RNECF (30). This means that ROHCF’s stock grew similarly to RNECF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RNECFROHCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RNECF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRBK72.251.74
+2.47%
Green Brick Partners
RPID3.270.06
+1.87%
Rapid Micro Biosystems
SXC8.200.12
+1.49%
Suncoke Energy
TYL529.727.50
+1.44%
Tyler Technologies
PSIG0.48N/A
+0.90%
PS International Group Ltd.

RNECF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RNECF and RNECY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RNECF and RNECY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNECF
1D Price
Change %
RNECF100%
+0.97%
RNECY - RNECF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
DSCSY - RNECF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.64%
ROHCY - RNECF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIXXF - RNECF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
SIMO - RNECF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More

ROHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ROHCF and ROHCY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ROHCF and ROHCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROHCF
1D Price
Change %
ROHCF100%
N/A
ROHCY - ROHCF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNECY - ROHCF
13%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
SILXF - ROHCF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
RNECF - ROHCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SLOIF - ROHCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More