RNDXF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 26 closing price
VMSSF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

RNDXF vs VMSSF

Header iconRNDXF vs VMSSF Comparison
Open Charts RNDXF vs VMSSFBanner chart's image
Randgold & Exploration
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.33K
CapitalizationN/A
Vortex Metals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.32K
CapitalizationN/A
RNDXF vs VMSSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RNDXF vs. VMSSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNDXF is a Hold and VMSSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (RNDXF: $0.02 vs. VMSSF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: RNDXF and VMSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RNDXF: 100% vs. VMSSF: 1%
Market capitalization -- RNDXF: $3.69M vs. VMSSF: $4.99M
RNDXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.69M. VMSSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RNDXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVMSSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RNDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VMSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VMSSF is a better buy in the long-term than RNDXF.

Price Growth

RNDXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VMSSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMSSF($4.99M) has a higher market cap than RNDXF($3.69M). RNDXF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. VMSSF (-35.758). VMSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.38M vs. RNDXF (-21.31M). RNDXF has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. VMSSF (1.66M). RNDXF (0) and VMSSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RNDXFVMSSFRNDXF / VMSSF
Capitalization3.69M4.99M74%
EBITDA-21.31M-2.38M894%
Gain YTD0.000-35.758-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash106M1.66M6,386%
Total DebtN/A21.2K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNDXF: Fundamental Ratings
RNDXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

RNDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNDXF has been closely correlated with AUHIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RNDXF jumps, then AUHIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNDXF
1D Price
Change %
RNDXF100%
N/A
AUHIF - RNDXF
94%
Closely correlated
N/A
ELMGF - RNDXF
69%
Closely correlated
-5.71%
SBSW - RNDXF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
XTGRF - RNDXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
ETFLF - RNDXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-18.67%
More

VMSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VMSSF and ELMGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VMSSF and ELMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMSSF
1D Price
Change %
VMSSF100%
-9.39%
ELMGF - VMSSF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
RIOFF - VMSSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
BDLNF - VMSSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.32%
RNDXF - VMSSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSRFF - VMSSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More