RNDXF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Updated
May 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.69M
SBSW
Price
$7.01
Change
-$0.54 (-7.15%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RNDXF vs SBSW

Header iconRNDXF vs SBSW Comparison
Open Charts RNDXF vs SBSWBanner chart's image
Randgold & Exploration
Price$0.04
Change+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.69M
Sibanye-Stillwater
Price$7.01
Change-$0.54 (-7.15%)
Volume$14.19M
Capitalization3.24B
RNDXF vs SBSW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RNDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RNDXF vs. SBSW commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNDXF is a Hold and SBSW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RNDXF: $0.04 vs. SBSW: $7.01)
Brand notoriety: RNDXF and SBSW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RNDXF: 1% vs. SBSW: 132%
Market capitalization -- RNDXF: $3.69M vs. SBSW: $3.24B
RNDXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.69M. SBSW’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RNDXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBSW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RNDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RNDXF and SBSW are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RNDXF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBSW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RNDXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SBSW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RNDXF is a better buy in the short-term than SBSW.

Price Growth

RNDXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBSW (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBSW($3.24B) has a higher market cap than RNDXF($3.69M). SBSW (112.424) and RNDXF (108.500) have similar YTD gains . SBSW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.7B vs. RNDXF (-21.31M). SBSW has more cash in the bank: 22.2B vs. RNDXF (106M). SBSW has higher revenues than RNDXF: SBSW (128B) vs RNDXF (0).
RNDXFSBSWRNDXF / SBSW
Capitalization3.69M3.24B0%
EBITDA-21.31M22.7B-0%
Gain YTD108.500112.42497%
P/E RatioN/A4.54-
Revenue0128B-
Total Cash106M22.2B0%
Total DebtN/A26B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNDXF vs SBSW: Fundamental Ratings
RNDXF
SBSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
9399
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1278
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBSW's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RNDXF (92). This means that SBSW’s stock grew significantly faster than RNDXF’s over the last 12 months.

SBSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as RNDXF (100). This means that SBSW’s stock grew similarly to RNDXF’s over the last 12 months.

RNDXF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SBSW (99). This means that RNDXF’s stock grew similarly to SBSW’s over the last 12 months.

RNDXF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SBSW (36). This means that RNDXF’s stock grew similarly to SBSW’s over the last 12 months.

RNDXF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBSW (78). This means that RNDXF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBSW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RNDXFSBSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RNDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UTMD57.801.36
+2.41%
Utah Medical Products
IBN33.870.48
+1.44%
ICICI Bank Limited
FRSH14.82N/A
N/A
Freshworks
CODX0.26N/A
-1.65%
Co-Diagnostics
INDI3.63-0.21
-5.47%
indie Semiconductor

RNDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RNDXF and SBSW have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RNDXF and SBSW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNDXF
1D Price
Change %
RNDXF100%
N/A
SBSW - RNDXF
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.15%
XTGRF - RNDXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
ETFLF - RNDXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
AMEGF - RNDXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.51%
RLYGF - RNDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBSW has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBSW jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBSW
1D Price
Change %
SBSW100%
-7.15%
PAAS - SBSW
68%
Closely correlated
-4.84%
HMY - SBSW
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.67%
AU - SBSW
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WPM - SBSW
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
AG - SBSW
64%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
More