Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMT vs VB
RMT vs VB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMT vs. VB commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMT is a Hold and VB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VB has more net assets: 162B vs. RMT (616M). RMT has a higher annual dividend yield than VB: RMT (12.548) vs VB (5.627). RMT was incepted earlier than VB: RMT (32 years) vs VB (22 years). VB (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than RMT (1.35). RMT has a higher turnover VB (13.00) vs VB (13.00).
| RMT | VB | RMT / VB | |
| Gain YTD | 12.548 | 5.627 | 223% |
| Net Assets | 616M | 162B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.05 | 2,700% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 13.00 | 408% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 1.34 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RMT | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OMFL | 59.71 | 0.51 | +0.86% |
| Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF | |||
| ILS | 20.21 | 0.04 | +0.19% |
| Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | |||
| FLSA | 35.10 | 0.04 | +0.12% |
| Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | |||
| GXUS | 53.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF | |||
| KCCA | 17.98 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
| KraneShares California Carbon Allw ETF | |||
RMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RMT and TRNS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMT and TRNS's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMT | 100% | -1.24% | ||
| TRNS - RMT | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
| MLAB - RMT | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| LASR - RMT | 10% Poorly correlated | -5.05% | ||
| ASPN - RMT | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.45% | ||
| EVI - RMT | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||
VB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VB has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VB jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y