RMSYF
Price
$25.18
Change
-$0.07 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.06B
VLXC
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMSYF vs VLXC

Header iconRMSYF vs VLXC Comparison
Open Charts RMSYF vs VLXCBanner chart's image
Ramsay Health Care
Price$25.18
Change-$0.07 (-0.28%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.06B
Veltex
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization13.48M
RMSYF vs VLXC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMSYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMSYF vs. VLXC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMSYF is a Hold and VLXC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (RMSYF: $25.18 vs. VLXC: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: RMSYF and VLXC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMSYF: 67% vs. VLXC: 7%
Market capitalization -- RMSYF: $9.06B vs. VLXC: $13.48M
RMSYF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $9.06B. VLXC’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $13.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMSYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLXC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMSYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLXC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMSYF is a better buy in the long-term than VLXC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMSYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLXC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMSYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • VLXC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLXC is a better buy in the short-term than RMSYF.

Price Growth

RMSYF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while VLXC (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +18.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.51% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMSYF($9.06B) has a higher market cap than VLXC($13.5M). VLXC YTD gains are higher at: 26.866 vs. RMSYF (19.506). RMSYF has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. VLXC (19.9K). VLXC has less debt than RMSYF: VLXC (1.57M) vs RMSYF (9.52B).
RMSYFVLXCRMSYF / VLXC
Capitalization9.06B13.5M67,089%
EBITDA1.71BN/A-
Gain YTD19.50626.86673%
P/E Ratio43.48N/A-
Revenue13.7BN/A-
Total Cash1.5B19.9K7,557,789%
Total Debt9.52B1.57M608,115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMSYF vs VLXC: Fundamental Ratings
RMSYF
VLXC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMSYF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as VLXC (99). This means that RMSYF’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

RMSYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VLXC (100). This means that RMSYF’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

RMSYF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as VLXC (100). This means that RMSYF’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

VLXC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as RMSYF (47). This means that VLXC’s stock grew similarly to RMSYF’s over the last 12 months.

RMSYF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLXC (100). This means that RMSYF’s stock grew significantly faster than VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMSYFVLXC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMSYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VAMO30.640.18
+0.58%
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
JSI52.30-0.02
-0.04%
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
EDEN114.39-0.22
-0.19%
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
GLD307.14-2.11
-0.68%
SPDR® Gold Shares
SKRE10.48-0.22
-2.06%
Tuttle Cptl Dl 2X Invrs Rgnl Banks ETF

RMSYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMSYF and DVA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMSYF and DVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMSYF
1D Price
Change %
RMSYF100%
N/A
DVA - RMSYF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPS - RMSYF
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
VLXC - RMSYF
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
RYHTY - RMSYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKAGY - RMSYF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More

VLXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLXC and BUGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLXC and BUGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLXC
1D Price
Change %
VLXC100%
-3.38%
BUGDF - VLXC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMS - VLXC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
RKAGY - VLXC
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
RHCGF - VLXC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPS - VLXC
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
More