Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQHX vs UGPSX
RMQHX vs UGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQHX vs. UGPSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQHX is a Buy and UGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. UGPSX (27.5M). UGPSX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: UGPSX (1.67) vs RMQHX (0.22). RMQHX was incepted earlier than UGPSX: RMQHX (11 years) vs UGPSX (17 years). UGPSX (2.80) is less costly to investors than RMQHX (1.95). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPSX (159.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPSX: RMQHX (2500) vs UGPSX (15000). UGPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.77 vs. RMQHX (14.79). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 142.68 vs. UGPSX (-83.70).
| RMQHX | UGPSX | RMQHX / UGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.80 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.80 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.793 | 35.491 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 27.5M | 3,745% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.67 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.79 | 40.77 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.20 | -26.49 | -458% |
| Returns for 5 years | 142.68 | -83.70 | -170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 981.97 | -77.87 | -1,261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement