Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQHX vs UGPIX
RMQHX vs UGPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQHX vs. UGPIX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQHX is a Buy and UGPIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 803M vs. UGPIX (26.9M). UGPIX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: UGPIX (2.27) vs RMQHX (0.21). RMQHX was incepted earlier than UGPIX: RMQHX (11 years) vs UGPIX (18 years). RMQHX (1.95) is less costly to investors than UGPIX (1.80). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPIX (159.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPIX: RMQHX (2500) vs UGPIX (15000). UGPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.85 vs. RMQHX (11.08). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 122.21 vs. UGPIX (-84.02).
| RMQHX | UGPIX | RMQHX / UGPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.80 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.80 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.866 | 34.386 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 803M | 26.9M | 2,985% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 2.27 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.08 | 34.85 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.31 | -20.41 | -403% |
| Returns for 5 years | 122.21 | -84.02 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1026.39 | -73.70 | -1,393% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement