Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UGPSX
RMQCX vs UGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UGPSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 948M vs. UGPSX (29.3M). UGPSX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UGPSX (1.36) vs RMQCX (0.24). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UGPSX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UGPSX (18 years). UGPSX (2.80) is less costly to investors than RMQCX (2.56). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPSX (159.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UGPSX (15000). UGPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.89 vs. RMQCX (13.18). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 90.79 vs. UGPSX (-84.63).
| RMQCX | UGPSX | RMQCX / UGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.80 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 2.80 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.201 | 49.147 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 948M | 29.3M | 3,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.36 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.18 | 72.89 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.06 | -8.12 | -1,490% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.79 | -84.63 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 993.60 | -66.40 | -1,496% |