Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UGPIX
RMQCX vs UGPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UGPIX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UGPIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 803M vs. UGPIX (26.9M). UGPIX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UGPIX (2.27) vs RMQCX (0.24). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UGPIX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UGPIX (18 years). RMQCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than UGPIX (1.80). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPIX (159.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPIX: RMQCX (2500) vs UGPIX (15000). UGPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.85 vs. RMQCX (7.24). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 106.27 vs. UGPIX (-84.02).
| RMQCX | UGPIX | RMQCX / UGPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.80 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.80 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.308 | 34.386 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 803M | 26.9M | 2,985% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 2.27 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 34.85 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.76 | -20.41 | -356% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.27 | -84.02 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 885.22 | -73.70 | -1,201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement