Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UGPIX
RMQCX vs UGPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UGPIX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UGPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 954M vs. UGPIX (21.8M). UGPIX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UGPIX (2.45) vs RMQCX (0.25). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UGPIX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UGPIX (17 years). RMQCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than UGPIX (1.80). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. UGPIX (159.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPIX: RMQCX (2500) vs UGPIX (15000). UGPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. RMQCX (-7.03). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 123.93 vs. UGPIX (-84.90).
| RMQCX | UGPIX | RMQCX / UGPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.80 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.80 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.752 | 16.760 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 954M | 21.8M | 4,376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 2.45 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.03 | 9.04 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.36 | -45.03 | -267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.93 | -84.90 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 873.91 | -80.77 | -1,082% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement