Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UGPIX
RMQCX vs UGPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UGPIX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UGPIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. UGPIX (27.5M). UGPIX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UGPIX (2.45) vs RMQCX (0.25). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UGPIX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UGPIX (17 years). RMQCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than UGPIX (1.80). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPIX (159.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPIX: RMQCX (2500) vs UGPIX (15000). UGPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.18 vs. RMQCX (10.82). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 125.27 vs. UGPIX (-82.86).
| RMQCX | UGPIX | RMQCX / UGPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.80 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.80 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.304 | 36.271 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 27.5M | 3,745% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 2.45 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.82 | 42.18 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.63 | -24.24 | -452% |
| Returns for 5 years | 125.27 | -82.86 | -151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 846.22 | -75.53 | -1,120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement