Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UBPSX
RMQCX vs UBPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UBPSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Hold and UBPSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 448M vs. UBPSX (11.1M). UBPSX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UBPSX (3.28) vs RMQCX (0.21). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UBPSX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UBPSX (18 years). UBPSX (3.00) is less costly to investors than RMQCX (2.56). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UBPSX (150.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UBPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UBPSX (15000). UBPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 84.67 vs. RMQCX (-10.58). UBPSX return over 5 years is better than : 64.05 vs. RMQCX (38.61).
| RMQCX | UBPSX | RMQCX / UBPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.78 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 3.00 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.072 | 87.523 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 448M | 11.1M | 4,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 3.28 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.58 | 84.67 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 129.17 | 69.25 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.61 | 64.05 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 650.33 | 57.40 | 1,133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement