Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UBPSX
RMQCX vs UBPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UBPSX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Hold and UBPSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 965M vs. UBPSX (7.89M). UBPSX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UBPSX (3.96) vs RMQCX (0.22). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UBPSX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UBPSX (18 years). UBPSX (2.93) is less costly to investors than RMQCX (2.56). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UBPSX (111.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UBPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UBPSX (15000). UBPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.48 vs. RMQCX (9.46). UBPSX return over 5 years is better than : 144.90 vs. RMQCX (101.61).
| RMQCX | UBPSX | RMQCX / UBPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.78 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 2.93 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.254 | 50.820 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 965M | 7.89M | 12,228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 3.96 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 23.48 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 186.01 | 34.75 | 535% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.61 | 144.90 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1030.16 | 5.22 | 19,729% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement