Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UBPSX
RMQCX vs UBPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UBPSX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UBPSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 954M vs. UBPSX (8.14M). UBPSX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UBPSX (4.42) vs RMQCX (0.25). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UBPSX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UBPSX (18 years). UBPSX (2.93) is less costly to investors than RMQCX (2.71). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. UBPSX (111.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UBPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UBPSX (15000). UBPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.57 vs. RMQCX (-7.03). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 123.93 vs. UBPSX (113.97).
| RMQCX | UBPSX | RMQCX / UBPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 2.78 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 2.93 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.752 | 44.718 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 954M | 8.14M | 11,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 4.42 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.03 | 17.57 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.36 | 43.16 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.93 | 113.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 873.91 | -37.21 | -2,348% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement