Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UBPSX
RMQCX vs UBPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UBPSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Hold and UBPSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 981M vs. UBPSX (14.3M). UBPSX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UBPSX (3.69) vs RMQCX (0.00). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UBPSX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UBPSX (18 years). UBPSX (3.00) is less costly to investors than RMQCX (2.56). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UBPSX (150.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UBPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UBPSX (15000). UBPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 131.29 vs. RMQCX (-8.84). UBPSX return over 5 years is better than : 151.94 vs. RMQCX (18.73).
| RMQCX | UBPSX | RMQCX / UBPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.78 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 3.00 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.126 | 40.902 | 0% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 981M | 14.3M | 6,860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.69 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.84 | 131.29 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.05 | 115.68 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.73 | 151.94 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 890.78 | 158.12 | 563% |