Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UBPSX
RMQCX vs UBPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UBPSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UBPSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 948M vs. UBPSX (7.56M). UBPSX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UBPSX (4.17) vs RMQCX (0.24). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UBPSX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UBPSX (18 years). UBPSX (2.93) is less costly to investors than RMQCX (2.56). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UBPSX (111.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UBPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UBPSX (15000). UBPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.62 vs. RMQCX (13.37). UBPSX return over 5 years is better than : 110.27 vs. RMQCX (91.11).
| RMQCX | UBPSX | RMQCX / UBPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.78 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 2.93 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.401 | 48.270 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 948M | 7.56M | 12,541% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 4.17 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.37 | 14.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.43 | 34.83 | 349% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.11 | 110.27 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 995.43 | -3.36 | -29,656% |