RMLRF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.02 (-1.25%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
858.29M
TAJIF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
2.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMLRF vs TAJIF

Header iconRMLRF vs TAJIF Comparison
Open Charts RMLRF vs TAJIFBanner chart's image
Ramelius Resources
Price$1.57
Change-$0.02 (-1.25%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization858.29M
Tajiri Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9K
Capitalization2.94M
RMLRF vs TAJIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAJIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMLRF vs. TAJIF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLRF is a Hold and TAJIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RMLRF: $1.58 vs. TAJIF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: RMLRF and TAJIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMLRF: 30% vs. TAJIF: 13%
Market capitalization -- RMLRF: $858.29M vs. TAJIF: $2.94M
RMLRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $858.29M. TAJIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMLRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAJIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAJIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the long-term than TAJIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMLRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAJIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMLRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TAJIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAJIF is a better buy in the short-term than RMLRF.

Price Growth

RMLRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.51% price change this week, while TAJIF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($858M) has a higher market cap than TAJIF($2.94M). RMLRF YTD gains are higher at: 25.000 vs. TAJIF (-2.273). RMLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249M vs. TAJIF (-319.12K). RMLRF has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. TAJIF (5.36K). RMLRF has higher revenues than TAJIF: RMLRF (598M) vs TAJIF (0).
RMLRFTAJIFRMLRF / TAJIF
Capitalization858M2.94M29,233%
EBITDA249M-319.12K-78,028%
Gain YTD25.000-2.273-1,100%
P/E Ratio57.47N/A-
Revenue598M0-
Total Cash169M5.36K3,154,751%
Total Debt54MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMLRF: Fundamental Ratings
RMLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMLRFTAJIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAJIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBVA15.270.30
+2.00%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
NXPL0.740.01
+1.92%
NextPlat Corp
DOCS61.090.68
+1.13%
Doximity
BCML27.80-0.14
-0.50%
BayCom Corp
MAG20.71-0.81
-3.76%
MAG Silver Corp

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and NSVLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and NSVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
-1.56%
NSVLF - RMLRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIJMF - RMLRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAJIF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXROF - RMLRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+20.19%
More

TAJIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAJIF has been loosely correlated with MRIRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAJIF jumps, then MRIRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAJIF
1D Price
Change %
TAJIF100%
N/A
MRIRF - TAJIF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VLMGF - TAJIF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.98%
RMLRF - TAJIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
BKRRF - TAJIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.36%
TDRRF - TAJIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
More