RMLRF
Price
$1.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
TAJIF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

RMLRF vs TAJIF

Header iconRMLRF vs TAJIF Comparison
Open Charts RMLRF vs TAJIFBanner chart's image
Ramelius Resources
Price$1.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
Tajiri Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
CapitalizationN/A
RMLRF vs TAJIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMLRF vs. TAJIF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLRF is a Hold and TAJIF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (RMLRF: $1.35 vs. TAJIF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: RMLRF and TAJIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMLRF: 43% vs. TAJIF: 41%
Market capitalization -- RMLRF: $858.29M vs. TAJIF: $2.94M
RMLRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $858.29M. TAJIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMLRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAJIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAJIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RMLRF and TAJIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

RMLRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.92% price change this week, while TAJIF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($858M) has a higher market cap than TAJIF($2.94M). TAJIF YTD gains are higher at: 63.424 vs. RMLRF (17.391). RMLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249M vs. TAJIF (-319.12K). RMLRF has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. TAJIF (5.36K). RMLRF has higher revenues than TAJIF: RMLRF (598M) vs TAJIF (0).
RMLRFTAJIFRMLRF / TAJIF
Capitalization858M2.94M29,233%
EBITDA249M-319.12K-78,028%
Gain YTD17.39163.42427%
P/E Ratio57.47N/A-
Revenue598M0-
Total Cash169M5.36K3,154,751%
Total Debt54MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMLRF: Fundamental Ratings
RMLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and NSVLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and NSVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
N/A
NSVLF - RMLRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIJMF - RMLRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAJIF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXROF - RMLRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-13.00%
More

TAJIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAJIF has been loosely correlated with MRIRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAJIF jumps, then MRIRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAJIF
1D Price
Change %
TAJIF100%
N/A
MRIRF - TAJIF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VLMGF - TAJIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCMBF - TAJIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMLRF - TAJIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRRF - TAJIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.80%
More