RMLRF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.06 (-2.58%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.29B
RVLGF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.01 (-1.85%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
109.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMLRF vs RVLGF

Header iconRMLRF vs RVLGF Comparison
Open Charts RMLRF vs RVLGFBanner chart's image
Ramelius Resources
Price$2.27
Change-$0.06 (-2.58%)
Volume$48.18K
Capitalization4.29B
Revival Gold
Price$0.53
Change-$0.01 (-1.85%)
Volume$246.65K
Capitalization109.2M
RMLRF vs RVLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMLRF vs. RVLGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLRF is a Buy and RVLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RMLRF: $2.27 vs. RVLGF: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: RMLRF and RVLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMLRF: 185% vs. RVLGF: 104%
Market capitalization -- RMLRF: $4.29B vs. RVLGF: $109.2M
RMLRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.29B. RVLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $109.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMLRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RVLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the long-term than RVLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMLRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMLRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RVLGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the short-term than RVLGF.

Price Growth

RMLRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.76% price change this week, while RVLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($4.29B) has a higher market cap than RVLGF($109M). RVLGF YTD gains are higher at: 162.438 vs. RMLRF (79.762).
RMLRFRVLGFRMLRF / RVLGF
Capitalization4.29B109M3,939%
EBITDA635MN/A-
Gain YTD79.762162.43849%
P/E Ratio8.64N/A-
Revenue1.04BN/A-
Total CashN/A3.05M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMLRF vs RVLGF: Fundamental Ratings
RMLRF
RVLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2719
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
3598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5044

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLRF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (64). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (100). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (98). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RVLGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (38). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as RVLGF (100). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMLRFRVLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLMX30.910.16
+0.51%
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
BSCV16.720.06
+0.36%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corp Bd ETF
GEME29.17-0.04
-0.14%
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
GUT5.97-0.02
-0.33%
Gabelli Utility Trust
MYY17.89-0.26
-1.46%
ProShares Short MidCap400

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and ZIJMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and ZIJMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
-2.79%
ZIJMF - RMLRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAJIF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVLGF - RMLRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
RMGGF - RMLRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
More

RVLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLGF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLGF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLGF
1D Price
Change %
RVLGF100%
-1.81%
TORXF - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BCEKF - RVLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
WRLGF - RVLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
DPMLF - RVLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
LUGDF - RVLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
More