Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMLPX vs SMAPX
RMLPX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMLPX vs. SMAPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLPX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. RMLPX (1.18B). RMLPX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: RMLPX (5.04) vs SMAPX (4.13). RMLPX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: RMLPX (8 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). SMAPX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: SMAPX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.93 vs. RMLPX (9.14). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 240.79 vs. SMAPX (162.92).
| RMLPX | SMAPX | RMLPX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.37 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.40 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.709 | 3.039 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 1.24B | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.04 | 4.13 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 13.93 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.16 | 60.09 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 240.79 | 162.92 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement