Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMLPX vs SMAPX
RMLPX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMLPX vs. SMAPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLPX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX (1.25B) and RMLPX (1.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RMLPX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: RMLPX (4.94) vs SMAPX (4.14). RMLPX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: RMLPX (8 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). SMAPX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: SMAPX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. SMAPX (0.64). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 202.53 vs. SMAPX (131.75).
| RMLPX | SMAPX | RMLPX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.37 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.40 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.568 | 4.736 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 1.25B | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.94 | 4.14 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.55 | 0.64 | 396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.70 | 53.76 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 202.53 | 131.75 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 141.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement