Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMLPX vs SACEX
RMLPX vs SACEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMLPX vs. SACEX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLPX is a Hold and SACEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. SACEX (143M). SACEX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: SACEX (17.02) vs RMLPX (5.21). RMLPX was incepted earlier than SACEX: RMLPX (8 years) vs SACEX (10 years). SACEX (2.23) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). RMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. SACEX (13.00). SACEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: SACEX (500) vs RMLPX (2500). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.68 vs. SACEX (-4.62). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 186.77 vs. SACEX (111.14).
| RMLPX | SACEX | RMLPX / SACEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.23 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.23 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.459 | 4.875 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 143M | 845% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.21 | 17.02 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.68 | -4.62 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.88 | 30.86 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.77 | 111.14 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement