RMLFF
Price
$0.88
Change
-$0.01 (-1.12%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
548.1M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
RMLRF
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.14 (-5.11%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.97B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMLFF vs RMLRF

Header iconRMLFF vs RMLRF Comparison
Open Charts RMLFF vs RMLRFBanner chart's image
Rusoro Mining
Price$0.88
Change-$0.01 (-1.12%)
Volume$317.89K
Capitalization548.1M
Ramelius Resources
Price$2.60
Change-$0.14 (-5.11%)
Volume$23.24K
Capitalization2.97B
RMLFF vs RMLRF Comparison Chart in %
RMLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMLFF vs. RMLRF commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLFF is a Hold and RMLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (RMLFF: $0.88 vs. RMLRF: $2.60)
Brand notoriety: RMLFF and RMLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMLFF: 137% vs. RMLRF: 51%
Market capitalization -- RMLFF: $548.1M vs. RMLRF: $2.97B
RMLFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $548.1M. RMLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMLFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the long-term than RMLFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMLRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMLRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMLFF is a better buy in the short-term than RMLRF.

Price Growth

RMLFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.85% price change this week, while RMLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1771.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.75% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($2.98B) has a higher market cap than RMLFF($548M). RMLRF YTD gains are higher at: 106.349 vs. RMLFF (52.174). RMLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 635M vs. RMLFF (-77.57M). RMLRF has higher revenues than RMLFF: RMLRF (1.04B) vs RMLFF (0).
RMLFFRMLRFRMLFF / RMLRF
Capitalization548M2.98B18%
EBITDA-77.57M635M-12%
Gain YTD52.174106.34949%
P/E RatioN/A9.84-
Revenue01.04B-
Total Cash21KN/A-
Total Debt84.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMLFF vs RMLRF: Fundamental Ratings
RMLFF
RMLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8283
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3759
SMR RATING
1..100
10035
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4338
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8774
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLRF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLFF (34). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to RMLFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (59). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMLFF (100). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMLFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLFF (43). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to RMLFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLFF (87). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to RMLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMLFFRMLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGHCX38.47N/A
N/A
Invesco Health Care A
WOGSX156.77N/A
N/A
White Oak Select Growth
BLRAX11.80N/A
N/A
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
GCTRX52.45N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
AEPGX64.61-0.08
-0.12%
American Funds EUPAC A

RMLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLFF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLFF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLFF
1D Price
Change %
RMLFF100%
-1.56%
AUGO - RMLFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
GDRZF - RMLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+14.23%
GRCAF - RMLFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-13.70%
RMRDF - RMLFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-10.56%
RMLRF - RMLFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.11%
More

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and GLBKF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and GLBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
-5.11%
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMRDF - RMLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.56%
RMLFF - RMLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
RUPRF - RMLRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.90%
RMGGF - RMLRF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More