RMIAF
Price
$0.76
Change
+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.32M
ZNKKY
Price
$10.58
Change
+$1.38 (+15.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMIAF vs ZNKKY

Header iconRMIAF vs ZNKKY Comparison
Open Charts RMIAF vs ZNKKYBanner chart's image
Automotive Fin
Price$0.76
Change+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization10.32M
Zenkoku Hosho
Price$10.58
Change+$1.38 (+15.00%)
Volume$245
Capitalization2.44B
RMIAF vs ZNKKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZNKKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMIAF vs. ZNKKY commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMIAF is a Hold and ZNKKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (RMIAF: $0.76 vs. ZNKKY: $10.58)
Brand notoriety: RMIAF and ZNKKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMIAF: 104% vs. ZNKKY: 32%
Market capitalization -- RMIAF: $10.32M vs. ZNKKY: $2.44B
RMIAF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $10.32M. ZNKKY’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $2.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMIAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZNKKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RMIAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZNKKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZNKKY is a better buy in the long-term than RMIAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMIAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZNKKY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMIAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ZNKKY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZNKKY is a better buy in the short-term than RMIAF.

Price Growth

RMIAF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZNKKY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +15.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.61% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZNKKY($2.44B) has a higher market cap than RMIAF($10.3M). RMIAF YTD gains are higher at: 38.081 vs. ZNKKY (19.757). ZNKKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.4B vs. RMIAF (27.7K). ZNKKY has more cash in the bank: 174B vs. RMIAF (22M). RMIAF has less debt than ZNKKY: RMIAF (27.6M) vs ZNKKY (30B). ZNKKY has higher revenues than RMIAF: ZNKKY (50.3B) vs RMIAF (929K).
RMIAFZNKKYRMIAF / ZNKKY
Capitalization10.3M2.44B0%
EBITDA27.7K42.4B0%
Gain YTD38.08119.757193%
P/E RatioN/A11.60-
Revenue929K50.3B0%
Total Cash22M174B0%
Total Debt27.6M30B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMIAF vs ZNKKY: Fundamental Ratings
RMIAF
ZNKKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
768
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1666
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMIAF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as ZNKKY (31). This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to ZNKKY’s over the last 12 months.

ZNKKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMIAF (100). This means that ZNKKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZNKKY's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMIAF (76). This means that ZNKKY’s stock grew significantly faster than RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ZNKKY (43). This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to ZNKKY’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZNKKY (66). This means that RMIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZNKKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMIAFZNKKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZNKKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLPEY9.130.19
+2.10%
Galp Energia, SA
FMCCT21.810.31
+1.42%
Freddie Mac
PEGRY13.550.08
+0.59%
Pennon Group PLC
ATCMF0.09N/A
N/A
Atico Mining Corp
CVONF0.05N/A
N/A
Carnarvon Energy Limited

RMIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMIAF and VEL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMIAF and VEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMIAF
1D Price
Change %
RMIAF100%
N/A
VEL - RMIAF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
LU - RMIAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
MCVT - RMIAF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNKKY - RMIAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAURY - RMIAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZNKKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZNKKY and ASHTF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZNKKY and ASHTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZNKKY
1D Price
Change %
ZNKKY100%
N/A
ASHTF - ZNKKY
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.03%
AL - ZNKKY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
TBCRF - ZNKKY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
MAURY - ZNKKY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LU - ZNKKY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
More