RMGGY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
1.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WKGFF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMGGY vs WKGFF

Header iconRMGGY vs WKGFF Comparison
Open Charts RMGGY vs WKGFFBanner chart's image
Resolute Mining
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.6B
Westkam Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.09M
RMGGY vs WKGFF Comparison Chart in %
RMGGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WKGFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMGGY vs. WKGFF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMGGY is a Hold and WKGFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (RMGGY: $5.70 vs. WKGFF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: RMGGY and WKGFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMGGY: 19% vs. WKGFF: 31%
Market capitalization -- RMGGY: $1.6B vs. WKGFF: $1.09M
RMGGY [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.6B. WKGFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMGGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWKGFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMGGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WKGFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMGGY is a better buy in the long-term than WKGFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMGGY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WKGFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMGGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WKGFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WKGFF is a better buy in the short-term than RMGGY.

Price Growth

RMGGY (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WKGFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.71% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGGY($1.6B) has a higher market cap than WKGFF($1.09M). RMGGY YTD gains are higher at: 133.607 vs. WKGFF (-27.552). RMGGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 232M vs. WKGFF (-213.61K). RMGGY has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. WKGFF (5.33K). RMGGY has higher revenues than WKGFF: RMGGY (907M) vs WKGFF (0).
RMGGYWKGFFRMGGY / WKGFF
Capitalization1.6B1.09M147,064%
EBITDA232M-213.61K-108,609%
Gain YTD133.607-27.552-485%
P/E Ratio98.28N/A-
Revenue907M0-
Total Cash101M5.33K1,896,357%
Total Debt58.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMGGY vs WKGFF: Fundamental Ratings
RMGGY
WKGFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3982
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2475

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WKGFF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMGGY (89). This means that WKGFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMGGY’s over the last 12 months.

WKGFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGY (100). This means that WKGFF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGY’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGY's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as WKGFF (100). This means that RMGGY’s stock grew similarly to WKGFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WKGFF (82). This means that RMGGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WKGFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WKGFF (100). This means that RMGGY’s stock grew significantly faster than WKGFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMGGYWKGFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMGGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WKGFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKAN1.010.03
+3.39%
Akanda Corp
BRID7.940.21
+2.78%
Bridgford Foods Corp
MNR12.090.23
+1.94%
Mach Natural Resources LP
RYAM6.390.05
+0.80%
Rayonier Advanced Materials
TXRH169.95-0.96
-0.56%
Texas Roadhouse

RMGGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGGY and HMY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGGY and HMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGGY
1D Price
Change %
RMGGY100%
N/A
HMY - RMGGY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
USHAF - RMGGY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGMF - RMGGY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNDXF - RMGGY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLTMF - RMGGY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WKGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WKGFF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WKGFF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WKGFF
1D Price
Change %
WKGFF100%
N/A
GSISF - WKGFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNDXF - WKGFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSTBF - WKGFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMGGY - WKGFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGMF - WKGFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More