RMGGY
Price
$5.02
Change
+$0.92 (+22.44%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
USHAF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMGGY vs USHAF

Header iconRMGGY vs USHAF Comparison
Open Charts RMGGY vs USHAFBanner chart's image
Resolute Mining
Price$5.02
Change+$0.92 (+22.44%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.35B
USHA RES
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.33M
RMGGY vs USHAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMGGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMGGY vs. USHAF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMGGY is a Hold and USHAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (RMGGY: $5.02 vs. USHAF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: RMGGY and USHAF are both not notable
RMGGY represents the Precious Metals, while USHAF is part of the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMGGY: 120% vs. USHAF: 4%
Market capitalization -- RMGGY: $1.35B vs. USHAF: $2.33M
RMGGY [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.35B. USHAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMGGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSHAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMGGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USHAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RMGGY and USHAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMGGY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USHAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMGGY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • USHAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMGGY is a better buy in the short-term than USHAF.

Price Growth

RMGGY (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USHAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.74% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGGY($1.35B) has a higher market cap than USHAF($2.33M). RMGGY has higher P/E ratio than USHAF: RMGGY (86.55) vs USHAF (3.17). RMGGY YTD gains are higher at: 105.738 vs. USHAF (-35.211). RMGGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 232M vs. USHAF (-801.48K). RMGGY has higher revenues than USHAF: RMGGY (907M) vs USHAF (0).
RMGGYUSHAFRMGGY / USHAF
Capitalization1.35B2.33M57,935%
EBITDA232M-801.48K-28,946%
Gain YTD105.738-35.211-300%
P/E Ratio86.553.172,730%
Revenue907M0-
Total CashN/A1.12M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMGGY: Fundamental Ratings
RMGGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMGGYUSHAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMGGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGCIX10.260.06
+0.59%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure C
PRDGX85.140.10
+0.12%
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth
JORCX19.67-0.08
-0.41%
Janus Henderson Global Select C
IRLUX47.57-0.33
-0.69%
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Port S2
ASIRX12.11-0.15
-1.22%
Alger Small Cap Growth Institutional R

RMGGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGGY and HMY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGGY and HMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGGY
1D Price
Change %
RMGGY100%
N/A
HMY - RMGGY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
USHAF - RMGGY
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.98%
OMGGF - RMGGY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
RNDXF - RMGGY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLTMF - RMGGY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

USHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USHAF and TRX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USHAF and TRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USHAF
1D Price
Change %
USHAF100%
+6.98%
TRX - USHAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
OMGGF - USHAF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
RMGGY - USHAF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVTI - USHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSTBF - USHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More