RMGGF
Price
$0.92
Change
+$0.22 (+31.43%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RVLGF
Price
$0.64
Change
+$0.14 (+28.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
171.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMGGF vs RVLGF

Header iconRMGGF vs RVLGF Comparison
Open Charts RMGGF vs RVLGFBanner chart's image
Resolute Mining
Price$0.92
Change+$0.22 (+31.43%)
Volume$9.47K
Capitalization1.97B
Revival Gold
Price$0.64
Change+$0.14 (+28.00%)
Volume$405.77K
Capitalization171.36M
RMGGF vs RVLGF Comparison Chart in %
RMGGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RVLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMGGF vs. RVLGF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMGGF is a Hold and RVLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (RMGGF: $0.92 vs. RVLGF: $0.64)
Brand notoriety: RMGGF and RVLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMGGF: 63% vs. RVLGF: 94%
Market capitalization -- RMGGF: $1.97B vs. RVLGF: $171.36M
RMGGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.97B. RVLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $171.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $146.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMGGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RVLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMGGF is a better buy in the long-term than RVLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMGGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMGGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RVLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RVLGF is a better buy in the short-term than RMGGF.

Price Growth

RMGGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.00% price change this week, while RVLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +95.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.43% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGGF($1.97B) has a higher market cap than RVLGF($171M). RVLGF YTD gains are higher at: 25.196 vs. RMGGF (12.870). RMGGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 232M vs. RVLGF (-10.96M). RMGGF has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. RVLGF (24.6M). RMGGF has higher revenues than RVLGF: RMGGF (907M) vs RVLGF (0).
RMGGFRVLGFRMGGF / RVLGF
Capitalization1.97B171M1,152%
EBITDA232M-10.96M-2,116%
Gain YTD12.87025.19651%
P/E Ratio158.62N/A-
Revenue907M0-
Total Cash101M24.6M411%
Total Debt58.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMGGF vs RVLGF: Fundamental Ratings
RMGGF
RVLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8715
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
8996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RVLGF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (90). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as RVLGF (100). This means that RMGGF’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as RVLGF (96). This means that RMGGF’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RVLGF (37). This means that RMGGF’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVLGF (100). This means that RMGGF’s stock grew significantly faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMGGFRVLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMGGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RVLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEBC250.00N/A
N/A
Webco Industries, Inc.
BZLFF27.80N/A
N/A
Bunzl plc
LMPMY4.52N/A
N/A
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
TOELY130.44-3.18
-2.38%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
NEXD0.09-0.02
-18.19%
NEXT DYNAMICS INC.

RMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGGF and SROYF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGGF and SROYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGGF
1D Price
Change %
RMGGF100%
+2.08%
SROYF - RMGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
RMETF - RMGGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
RMRDF - RMGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.54%
RMLFF - RMGGF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
RVLGF - RMGGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+11.50%
More

RVLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLGF and WPM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLGF and WPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLGF
1D Price
Change %
RVLGF100%
+11.50%
WPM - RVLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.46%
SA - RVLGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+6.58%
TORXF - RVLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.94%
AGI - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.96%
RGLD - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
More