RMGGF
Price
$0.45
Change
+$0.01 (+2.27%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
975.59M
RMLRF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.06 (-2.58%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMGGF vs RMLRF

Header iconRMGGF vs RMLRF Comparison
Open Charts RMGGF vs RMLRFBanner chart's image
Resolute Mining
Price$0.45
Change+$0.01 (+2.27%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization975.59M
Ramelius Resources
Price$2.27
Change-$0.06 (-2.58%)
Volume$48.18K
Capitalization4.29B
RMGGF vs RMLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMGGF vs. RMLRF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMGGF is a Hold and RMLRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RMGGF: $0.45 vs. RMLRF: $2.27)
Brand notoriety: RMGGF and RMLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMGGF: 15% vs. RMLRF: 185%
Market capitalization -- RMGGF: $975.59M vs. RMLRF: $4.29B
RMGGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $975.59M. RMLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMGGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the long-term than RMGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMGGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMLRF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMGGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMLRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the short-term than RMGGF.

Price Growth

RMGGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while RMLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($4.29B) has a higher market cap than RMGGF($976M). RMGGF has higher P/E ratio than RMLRF: RMGGF (77.71) vs RMLRF (8.64). RMGGF YTD gains are higher at: 105.061 vs. RMLRF (79.762).
RMGGFRMLRFRMGGF / RMLRF
Capitalization976M4.29B23%
EBITDAN/A635M-
Gain YTD105.06179.762132%
P/E Ratio77.718.64900%
RevenueN/A1.04B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMGGF vs RMLRF: Fundamental Ratings
RMGGF
RMLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9735
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3881
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLRF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMGGF (87). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMGGF (100). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMGGF (97). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (40). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMLRF (81). This means that RMGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMGGFRMLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CALRX37.090.51
+1.39%
Calvert Small-Cap R6
REVRX13.860.11
+0.80%
Columbia Global Value R
DBOCX25.230.19
+0.76%
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity C
ADOIX18.840.13
+0.69%
Axs Dynamic Opportunity I
FNILX23.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index

RMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGGF and RMLRF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGGF and RMLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGGF
1D Price
Change %
RMGGF100%
+2.44%
RMLRF - RMGGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
RMETF - RMGGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
RVLGF - RMGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
RMLFF - RMGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
RRDMF - RMGGF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
More

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and ZIJMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and ZIJMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
-2.79%
ZIJMF - RMLRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAJIF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVLGF - RMLRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
RMGGF - RMLRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
More