Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.40
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$11.22
Change+$0.12 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.16M
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SUVCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. SUVCX (244M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: SUVCX (2.19) vs RMFEX (1.46). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFEX (23 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFEX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. SUVCX (-9.14). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. SUVCX (29.04).
| RMFEX | SUVCX | RMFEX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.13 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.46 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.941 | 9.684 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 244M | 45,492% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.19 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.28 | -9.14 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.09 | 5.52 | 727% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.52 | 29.04 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.84 | -6.21 | -1,592% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers