Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SFLNX
RMFEX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$30.65
Change-$0.11 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.23B
RMFEX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SFLNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SFLNX (10.2B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: SFLNX (1.63) vs RMFEX (1.49). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMFEX (23 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: SFLNX (0) vs RMFEX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. RMFEX (8.06). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 90.31 vs. RMFEX (58.84).
| RMFEX | SFLNX | RMFEX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.25 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.25 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.638 | 10.194 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 10.2B | 1,069% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.63 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 13.90 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.39 | 53.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.84 | 90.31 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.59 | 132.83 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers