Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs ZDIVX
RMFCX vs ZDIVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs ZDIVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
Zacks Dividend Investor
Price$26.26
Change-$0.22 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.5M
RMFCX vs ZDIVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. ZDIVX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and ZDIVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. ZDIVX (125M). ZDIVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ZDIVX (2.44) vs RMFCX (1.31). RMFCX was incepted earlier than ZDIVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs ZDIVX (11 years). ZDIVX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ZDIVX (11.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZDIVX: RMFCX (250) vs ZDIVX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. ZDIVX (8.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. ZDIVX (51.89).
| RMFCX | ZDIVX | RMFCX / ZDIVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.30 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.021 | 3.549 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 125M | 84,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 2.44 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 8.10 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.43 | 20.59 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.85 | 51.89 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.75 | 82.25 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement