Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WWLAX
RMFCX vs WWLAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WWLAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
Westwood Quality Value Fund A
Price$14.16
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.39M
RMFCX vs WWLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WWLAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WWLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. WWLAX (184M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WWLAX: RMFCX (1.26) vs WWLAX (1.15). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WWLAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WWLAX (18 years). RMFCX (0.91) and WWLAX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . WWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWLAX: RMFCX (250) vs WWLAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. WWLAX (-0.57). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.95 vs. WWLAX (22.18).
| RMFCX | WWLAX | RMFCX / WWLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.721 | 4.348 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 184M | 59,783% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.77 | -0.57 | -1,365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.69 | 11.49 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.95 | 22.18 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.02 | 30.90 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers