Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WWIDX
RMFCX vs WWIDX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WWIDX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
Allspring Large Company Value Admin
Price$14.95
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.5M
RMFCX vs WWIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WWIDX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WWIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. WWIDX (256M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WWIDX: RMFCX (1.27) vs WWIDX (0.96). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WWIDX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WWIDX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) and WWIDX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . WWIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWIDX: RMFCX (250) vs WWIDX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. WWIDX (3.53). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. WWIDX (32.03).
| RMFCX | WWIDX | RMFCX / WWIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.75 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.596 | 11.827 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 256M | 42,578% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.96 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 3.53 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.27 | 31.93 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.83 | 32.03 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.21 | 1.18 | 6,718% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement