Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WWIDX
RMFCX vs WWIDX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WWIDX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
Allspring Large Company Value Admin
Price$14.41
Change-$0.11 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.46M
RMFCX vs WWIDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WWIDX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WWIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. WWIDX (247M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WWIDX: RMFCX (1.31) vs WWIDX (1.04). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WWIDX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WWIDX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and WWIDX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . WWIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWIDX: RMFCX (250) vs WWIDX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. WWIDX (0.18). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. WWIDX (28.07).
| RMFCX | WWIDX | RMFCX / WWIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.75 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.021 | 7.565 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 247M | 42,915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.04 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 0.18 | 4,774% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.43 | 28.28 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.85 | 28.07 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.75 | -4.84 | -1,440% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement