Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WLCAX
RMFCX vs WLCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WLCAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
Allspring Large Company Value A
Price$14.70
Change+$0.07 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.5M
RMFCX vs WLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WLCAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. WLCAX (256M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WLCAX: RMFCX (1.27) vs WLCAX (0.92). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WLCAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WLCAX (17 years). WLCAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). WLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCAX: RMFCX (250) vs WLCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. WLCAX (3.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. WLCAX (30.94).
| RMFCX | WLCAX | RMFCX / WLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.82 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.96 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.596 | 11.844 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 256M | 42,578% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.92 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 3.30 | 348% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.27 | 27.64 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.83 | 30.94 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.21 | -0.36 | -22,149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement