Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WLCAX
RMFCX vs WLCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WLCAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.97B
Allspring Large Company Value A
Price$13.31
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.67M
RMFCX vs WLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WLCAX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. WLCAX (253M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WLCAX: RMFCX (1.27) vs WLCAX (0.92). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WLCAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WLCAX (17 years). WLCAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). WLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCAX: RMFCX (250) vs WLCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. WLCAX (-8.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.95 vs. WLCAX (13.49).
| RMFCX | WLCAX | RMFCX / WLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.82 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.96 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.739 | 1.376 | 780% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 253M | 43,478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.92 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.45 | -8.10 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.88 | 10.51 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.95 | 13.49 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.15 | -9.46 | -837% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement