Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WHGLX
RMFCX vs WHGLX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WHGLX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
Westwood Quality Value Fund Inst
Price$14.26
Change+$0.09 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.48M
RMFCX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WHGLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a StrongBuy and WHGLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. WHGLX (183M). WHGLX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: WHGLX (1.28) vs RMFCX (1.18). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: RMFCX (24 years) vs WHGLX (19 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than WHGLX (0.69). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: RMFCX (250) vs WHGLX (100000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. WHGLX (-5.58). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. WHGLX (14.98).
| RMFCX | WHGLX | RMFCX / WHGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.69 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.983 | 6.083 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 183M | 61,202% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.28 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | -5.58 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.11 | 13.41 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.85 | 14.98 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.59 | 35.88 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers