Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WFLVX
RMFCX vs WFLVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WFLVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
Allspring Large Company Value C
Price$14.96
Change-$0.11 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.46M
RMFCX vs WFLVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WFLVX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WFLVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. WFLVX (247M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WFLVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs WFLVX (0.28). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WFLVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WFLVX (17 years). WFLVX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). WFLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFLVX: RMFCX (250) vs WFLVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. WFLVX (-0.16). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. WFLVX (25.92).
| RMFCX | WFLVX | RMFCX / WFLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.57 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.71 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.021 | 7.218 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 247M | 42,915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.28 | 463% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | -0.16 | -5,534% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.43 | 26.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.85 | 25.92 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.75 | -8.02 | -870% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement