Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WFLVX
RMFCX vs WFLVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WFLVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.11
Change-$0.30 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
Allspring Large Company Value C
Price$14.15
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.67M
RMFCX vs WFLVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WFLVX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WFLVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. WFLVX (253M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WFLVX: RMFCX (1.27) vs WFLVX (0.25). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WFLVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WFLVX (17 years). WFLVX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). WFLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFLVX: RMFCX (250) vs WFLVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. WFLVX (-6.38). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. WFLVX (14.15).
| RMFCX | WFLVX | RMFCX / WFLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.57 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.71 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.347 | 1.449 | 783% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 253M | 43,874% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.25 | 514% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.38 | -6.38 | -178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.87 | 16.83 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.49 | 14.15 | 428% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.82 | -10.35 | -791% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers