Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVZX
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
Price$13.68
Change+$0.14 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.16M
RMFCX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVZX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. SUVZX (244M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVZX (2.86) vs RMFCX (1.20). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVZX (25 years). SUVZX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SUVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. SUVZX (-5.65). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. SUVZX (44.12).
| RMFCX | SUVZX | RMFCX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.689 | 10.893 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 244M | 45,492% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.86 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | -5.65 | -88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.79 | 13.70 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.10 | 44.12 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.18 | 13.93 | 654% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers