Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SUVCX
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$11.22
Change+$0.12 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.16M
RMFCX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SUVCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. SUVCX (244M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SUVCX (2.19) vs RMFCX (1.20). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFCX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. SUVCX (-9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. SUVCX (29.04).
| RMFCX | SUVCX | RMFCX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.13 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.46 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.689 | 9.684 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 244M | 45,492% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.19 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | -9.14 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.79 | 5.52 | 703% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.10 | 29.04 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.18 | -6.21 | -1,469% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers