Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.27
Change+$0.22 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets270.98M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and STVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. STVZX (271M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (2.18) vs RMFCX (1.26). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (24 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.54 vs. STVZX (1.52). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.70 vs. STVZX (-19.38).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.465 | 6.033 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 271M | 41,328% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 2.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.54 | 1.52 | 693% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.51 | 4.68 | 609% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.70 | -19.38 | -231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.63 | -10.46 | -1,058% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers