Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs STVZX
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.83
Change-$0.18 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.6M
RMFCX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STVZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STVZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. STVZX (258M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STVZX (1.41) vs RMFCX (1.21). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMFCX (0.91) and STVZX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMFCX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. STVZX (-12.23). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. STVZX (-10.63).
| RMFCX | STVZX | RMFCX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.093 | 9.010 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 258M | 43,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.41 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | -12.23 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.56 | 5.77 | 529% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.90 | -10.63 | -517% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.04 | -22.61 | -416% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement