Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$18.28
Change-$0.23 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.98M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SLVCX (18M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.21) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLVCX (27 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. SLVCX (-14.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. SLVCX (-6.37).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.093 | 12.866 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 18M | 622,222% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | -14.54 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.56 | -4.98 | -614% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.90 | -6.37 | -861% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.04 | 4.64 | 2,029% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement