Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$15.85
Change-$2.33 (-12.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.5M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SLVCX (17.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.24) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SLVCX (27 years). SLVCX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLVCX: RMFCX (250) vs SLVCX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. SLVCX (-5.99). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. SLVCX (-29.08).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.77 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.77 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.244 | 3.056 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 17.5M | 640,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | -5.99 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.73 | -12.72 | -226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.16 | -29.08 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.79 | 5.32 | 1,990% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement