Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLVCX
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$15.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.54M
RMFCX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLVCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SLVCX (17.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMFCX (1.26) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SLVCX (27 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. SLVCX (-4.16). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.17 vs. SLVCX (-27.61).
| RMFCX | SLVCX | RMFCX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.091 | 3.316 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 17.5M | 640,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.33 | -4.16 | -272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.04 | -8.36 | -335% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.17 | -27.61 | -160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.86 | 1.47 | 7,480% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement