Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$27.51
Change-$1.52 (-5.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.64M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SLCVX (17.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.24) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. SLCVX (2.84). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. SLCVX (-3.10).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.79 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.79 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.244 | 3.111 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 17.6M | 636,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | 2.84 | 262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.73 | 5.44 | 528% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.16 | -3.10 | -1,425% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.79 | 56.15 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement