Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$27.13
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.5M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SLCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SLCVX (17.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.18) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (24 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. SLCVX (3.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. SLCVX (4.39).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.715 | 4.386 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 17.5M | 640,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 3.00 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.72 | 15.89 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.19 | 4.39 | 1,053% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.34 | 30.96 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement