Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$29.20
Change+$0.26 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.69M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. SLCVX (17.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.20) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. SLCVX (-6.50). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.04 vs. SLCVX (28.01).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.613 | 12.351 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 17.7M | 627,119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | -6.50 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.44 | 19.82 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.04 | 28.01 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.77 | 40.01 | 222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement