Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SFLNX
RMFCX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$30.65
Change-$0.11 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.23B
RMFCX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SFLNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SFLNX (10.2B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SFLNX (1.63) vs RMFCX (1.24). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SFLNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. RMFCX (7.71). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 90.31 vs. RMFCX (56.41).
| RMFCX | SFLNX | RMFCX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.25 | 364% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.25 | 364% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.421 | 10.194 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 10.2B | 1,069% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.63 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.71 | 13.90 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 53.66 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.41 | 90.31 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.12 | 132.83 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers