Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFAX vs VIVAX
RMFAX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFAX vs VIVAX
American Funds American Mutual R1
Price$57.34
Change-$0.45 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$67.64
Change-$0.55 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.77B
RMFAX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFAX vs. VIVAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFAX is a Buy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. RMFAX (106B). VIVAX pays higher dividends than RMFAX: VIVAX (2.16) vs RMFAX (0.89). RMFAX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: RMFAX (23 years) vs VIVAX (33 years). RMFAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). RMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). RMFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: RMFAX (250) vs VIVAX (3000). RMFAX (8.19) and VIVAX (8.01) have marching annual gain over last year. VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 72.56 vs. RMFAX (56.24).
| RMFAX | VIVAX | RMFAX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.17 | 794% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.17 | 794% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.794 | 2.419 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 189B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 2.16 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.19 | 8.01 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.69 | 32.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.24 | 72.56 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.62 | 103.54 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement