RMETF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.05 (+10.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
79.28M
RUPRF
Price
$4.04
Change
-$0.09 (-2.18%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
952.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMETF vs RUPRF

Header iconRMETF vs RUPRF Comparison
Open Charts RMETF vs RUPRFBanner chart's image
Rackla Metals
Price$0.55
Change+$0.05 (+10.00%)
Volume$179.79K
Capitalization79.28M
Rupert Resources
Price$4.04
Change-$0.09 (-2.18%)
Volume$30.59K
Capitalization952.96M
RMETF vs RUPRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMETF vs. RUPRF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMETF is a Hold and RUPRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RMETF: $0.55 vs. RUPRF: $4.03)
Brand notoriety: RMETF and RUPRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMETF: 102% vs. RUPRF: 199%
Market capitalization -- RMETF: $79.28M vs. RUPRF: $952.96M
RMETF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $79.28M. RUPRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $952.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMETF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUPRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMETF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMETF is a better buy in the long-term than RUPRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMETF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUPRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMETF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUPRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMETF is a better buy in the short-term than RUPRF.

Price Growth

RMETF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.50% price change this week, while RUPRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUPRF($953M) has a higher market cap than RMETF($79.3M). RMETF YTD gains are higher at: 687.286 vs. RUPRF (45.144). RMETF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.2M vs. RUPRF (-6.85M). RUPRF has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. RMETF (6.5M). RUPRF has less debt than RMETF: RUPRF (0) vs RMETF (171K). RMETF (0) and RUPRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RMETFRUPRFRMETF / RUPRF
Capitalization79.3M953M8%
EBITDA-3.2M-6.85M47%
Gain YTD687.28645.1441,522%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.5M106M6%
Total Debt171K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMETF vs RUPRF: Fundamental Ratings
RMETF
RUPRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5862
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3466
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUPRF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as RMETF (66). This means that RUPRF’s stock grew similarly to RMETF’s over the last 12 months.

RMETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as RUPRF (66). This means that RMETF’s stock grew similarly to RUPRF’s over the last 12 months.

RUPRF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as RMETF (97). This means that RUPRF’s stock grew similarly to RMETF’s over the last 12 months.

RMETF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as RUPRF (42). This means that RMETF’s stock grew similarly to RUPRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMETF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RUPRF (100). This means that RMETF’s stock grew similarly to RUPRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMETFRUPRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CILJF2.83N/A
N/A
China Life Insurance Company Limited
KTEL0.35N/A
N/A
KonaTel, Inc.
ZLDSF29.11N/A
N/A
ZALANDO SE
PTNRF9.44N/A
N/A
Partner Communications Company Ltd.
AUTR0.52N/A
N/A
Autris

RMETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMETF and RMGGF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMETF and RMGGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMETF
1D Price
Change %
RMETF100%
N/A
RMGGF - RMETF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVLGF - RMETF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMLRF - RMETF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RUPRF - RMETF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRDMF - RMETF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RUPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RUPRF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUPRF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUPRF
1D Price
Change %
RUPRF100%
N/A
NSUPF - RUPRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCHDF - RUPRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGG - RUPRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGLCF - RUPRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTRF - RUPRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More