RMETF
Price
$0.49
Change
+$0.04 (+8.89%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
67.13M
RMGGF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.03 (-6.82%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
927.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMETF vs RMGGF

Header iconRMETF vs RMGGF Comparison
Open Charts RMETF vs RMGGFBanner chart's image
Rackla Metals
Price$0.49
Change+$0.04 (+8.89%)
Volume$45.46K
Capitalization67.13M
Resolute Mining
Price$0.41
Change-$0.03 (-6.82%)
Volume$20.5K
Capitalization927.7M
RMETF vs RMGGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMETF vs. RMGGF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMETF is a Hold and RMGGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (RMETF: $0.49 vs. RMGGF: $0.41)
Brand notoriety: RMETF and RMGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMETF: 31% vs. RMGGF: 208%
Market capitalization -- RMETF: $67.13M vs. RMGGF: $927.7M
RMETF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $67.13M. RMGGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $927.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMETF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMETF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RMETF and RMGGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMETF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMGGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMETF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMGGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMGGF is a better buy in the short-term than RMETF.

Price Growth

RMETF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.64% price change this week, while RMGGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.59% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGGF($928M) has a higher market cap than RMETF($67.1M). RMETF YTD gains are higher at: 603.286 vs. RMGGF (86.078).
RMETFRMGGFRMETF / RMGGF
Capitalization67.1M928M7%
EBITDA-3.06MN/A-
Gain YTD603.28686.078701%
P/E RatioN/A41.32-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.29MN/A-
Total Debt95.2KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMETF vs RMGGF: Fundamental Ratings
RMETF
RMGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
9996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1003
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMETF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (82). This means that RMETF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMGGF (100). This means that RMETF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as RMETF (99). This means that RMGGF’s stock grew similarly to RMETF’s over the last 12 months.

RMETF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (46). This means that RMETF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGGF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMETF (100). This means that RMGGF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMETFRMGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELRRF0.99N/A
+0.34%
Eloro Resources Ltd.
ARHUF26.26N/A
N/A
AAK AB
LBNW6.00N/A
N/A
Liberty Northwest Bancorp, Inc.
SLTCY4.98N/A
N/A
Siltronic AG
OVCHF13.05-0.79
-5.71%
Overseas Chinese Banking Corp., Ltd.

RMETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMETF and RMGGF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMETF and RMGGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMETF
1D Price
Change %
RMETF100%
+9.38%
RMGGF - RMETF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVLGF - RMETF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
RMLRF - RMETF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RUPRF - RMETF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
RRDMF - RMETF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGGF and RMLRF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGGF and RMLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGGF
1D Price
Change %
RMGGF100%
N/A
RMLRF - RMGGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMETF - RMGGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.38%
RVLGF - RMGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
RMLFF - RMGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+7.02%
RRDMF - RMGGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More