Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WHGLX
RMEBX vs WHGLX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WHGLX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.83
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
Westwood Quality Value Fund Inst
Price$14.26
Change+$0.09 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.48M
RMEBX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WHGLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a StrongBuy and WHGLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. WHGLX (183M). WHGLX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: WHGLX (1.28) vs RMEBX (1.03). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: RMEBX (11 years) vs WHGLX (19 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than WHGLX (0.69). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: RMEBX (250) vs WHGLX (100000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. WHGLX (-5.58). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.74 vs. WHGLX (14.98).
| RMEBX | WHGLX | RMEBX / WHGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.62 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.69 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.812 | 6.083 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 183M | 61,202% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.28 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.38 | -5.58 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.56 | 13.41 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.74 | 14.98 | 345% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.74 | 35.88 | 245% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers