Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WFLVX
RMEBX vs WFLVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WFLVX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
Allspring Large Company Value C
Price$14.96
Change-$0.11 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.46M
RMEBX vs WFLVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WFLVX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and WFLVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. WFLVX (247M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than WFLVX: RMEBX (1.16) vs WFLVX (0.28). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WFLVX: RMEBX (11 years) vs WFLVX (17 years). WFLVX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). WFLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFLVX: RMEBX (250) vs WFLVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. WFLVX (-0.16). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. WFLVX (25.92).
| RMEBX | WFLVX | RMEBX / WFLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.57 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.71 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.923 | 7.218 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 247M | 42,915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.28 | 408% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | -0.16 | -5,433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.89 | 26.27 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.69 | 25.92 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.22 | -8.02 | -851% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement