Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$11.39
Change-$0.14 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.44M
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SUVCX (251M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVCX (2.18) vs RMEBX (1.05). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. SUVCX (-7.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. SUVCX (22.58).
| RMEBX | SUVCX | RMEBX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.46 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.940 | 13.933 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 251M | 44,622% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 2.18 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | -7.03 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.03 | -0.94 | -3,210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.80 | 22.58 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.20 | -1.73 | -5,320% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers