Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.81
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$11.67
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.75M
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVCX commentary
Dec 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a StrongBuy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SUVCX (253M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVCX (2.12) vs RMEBX (1.03). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. SUVCX (-6.42). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.87 vs. SUVCX (14.08).
| RMEBX | SUVCX | RMEBX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.46 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.289 | 15.316 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 253M | 44,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 2.12 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | -6.42 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.90 | 3.20 | 934% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.87 | 14.08 | 361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.32 | -0.85 | -10,732% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers