Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SLVCX
RMEBX vs SLVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLVCX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
Price$18.12
Change+$0.08 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.61M
RMEBX vs SLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLVCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SLVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. SLVCX (17.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLVCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs SLVCX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLVCX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SLVCX (27 years). SLVCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX (250) and SLVCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. SLVCX (-14.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. SLVCX (0.33).
| RMEBX | SLVCX | RMEBX / SLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.87 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.87 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.527 | 10.488 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 17.6M | 630,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.81 | -14.45 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.19 | 2.03 | 1,884% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.95 | 0.33 | 16,839% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.36 | 1.40 | 6,387% |